European Radiology · 2014 · 44 citations · 31 references
MedicineRadiologyUrologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyProstate DiseaseMedical ImagingProstate BiopsyProstate CancerProstate PathologyTumor ClassificationUrologic Cancer DiagnosisClinically Significant Prostate Cancer DetectionInternal ValidationLogistic RegressionModel Performance EvaluationMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Mri)Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstate Cancer DiagnosisProstate Tumor Classification
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to develop logistic regression (LR) models for classifying prostate cancer within the transition zone on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI). METHODS: One hundred and fifty-five patients (training cohort, 70 patients; temporal validation cohort, 85 patients) underwent mp-MRI and transperineal-template-prostate-mapping (TPM) biopsy. Positive cores were classified by cancer definitions: (1) any-cancer; (2) definition-1 [≥Gleason 4 + 3 or ≥ 6 mm cancer core length (CCL)] [high risk significant]; and (3) definition-2 (≥Gleason 3 + 4 or ≥ 4 mm CCL) cancer [intermediate-high risk significant]. For each, logistic-regression mp-MRI models were derived from the training cohort and validated internally and with the temporal cohort. Sensitivity/specificity and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC-AUC) curve were calculated. LR model performance was compared to radiologists' performance. RESULTS: Twenty-eight of 70 patients from the training cohort, and 25/85 patients from the temporal validation cohort had significant cancer on TPM. The ROC-AUC of the LR model for classification of cancer was 0.73/0.67 at internal/temporal validation. The radiologist A/B ROC-AUC was 0.65/0.74 (temporal cohort). For patients scored by radiologists as Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (Pi-RADS) score 3, sensitivity/specificity of radiologist A 'best guess' and LR model was 0.14/0.54 and 0.71/0.61, respectively; and radiologist B 'best guess' and LR model was 0.40/0.34 and 0.50/0.76, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LR models can improve classification of Pi-RADS score 3 lesions similar to experienced radiologists. KEY POINTS: • MRI helps find prostate cancer in the anterior of the gland • Logistic regression models based on mp-MRI can classify prostate cancer • Computers can help confirm cancer in areas doctors are uncertain about.
31
ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
Jelle O. Barentsz, Jonathan Richenberg, R. Clements et al. · European Radiology · 2012 · 2.4K citations · Full text
Evis Sala, Chaya S. Moskowitz, Kentaro Kuroiwa et al. · Radiology · 2006 · 381 citations
Arnauld Villers, Philippe Puech, Damien Mouton et al. · The Journal of Urology · 2006 · 371 citations