Journal of Aircraft · 2010 · 15 citations · 32 references
EngineeringAerospace EngineeringMechanical EngineeringAerodynamicsFluid DynamicsFluid MechanicsAerodynamic TestingBoundary Layer FlowBoundary LayersBoundary-layer TheoryExperimental AerodynamicsUnsteady AerodynamicsActive Flow ControlBoundary Layer MeasurementsCrossflow Boundary LayersDrag ReductionDynamic StallFlow Velocity MeasurementsJet Flow ExperimentsStall Control
The aerodynamic interaction between an unsteady, inclined synthetic jet and a crossflow boundary layer was studied as a precursor toward applying active flow control concepts for rotor applications, such as dynamic stall control and fuselage drag reduction. Because the flowfield offered numerous challenges from a measurement perspective, several experiments were carried out using a phase-locked, two-dimensional microscopic particle image velocity technique in a building block approach, by adding one complexity after another. The procedure began with boundary layer measurements made on a simple flat plate using the microscopic particle image velocity technique. Velocity measurements were made deep in the viscous sublayer, as close as 20μm from the surface. Following this, the synthetic jet actuator was characterized while operating in quiescent air as well as in crossflow. The results showed that the evolution of the synthetic jet in crossflow was substantially different from its evolution in quiescent air, suggesting that any flow physics or performance prediction (for example, the depth of penetration of the jet into the boundary layer) made based on the quiescent flow conditions may not be applicable in crossflow. All the momentum added to the boundary layer had its source from the synthetic jet actuator, and the penetration of the jet was limited to the viscous sublayer and log layer; the outer layer was unaffected, despite using a jet to freestream velocity ratio of four. Significant effort was also made to validate the microscopic particle image velocity technique and evaluate its capability to accurately resolve such a complex flowfield. To this end, microscopic particle image velocity measurements were compared with hot-wire measurements made on a simple steady jet, as well as an unsteady, periodic synthetic jet. Excellent correlation was found between the two techniques, validating microscopic particle image velocity measurements.
32