Soil Science Society of America Journal · 1991 · 89 citations · 0 references
AgricultureEarth SciencesSoil SciencesSoil ChemistrySoil PhysicsSoil ScienceClay MineralsNitrogen ManagementSoil Chemical PropertiesSoil EvaporationSoil MoistureWater ContentClay ContentClay Mineral Effects On Nutrient RetentionEvaporation From Surface WaterNitrogen Fertilization EffectsSoil Clay ContentSoil Moisture Effects On VolatilizationSoil Silt ContentWater Potential
Abstract Soil water content is an important factor influencing NH 3 volatilization from N fertilizers. Information on the relationship between water evaporation and NH 3 volatilization from urea (U) or urea‐ammonium nitrate (UAN) solutions, and on the kinetics of both processes is lacking. We examined NH 3 volatilization from surface‐applied solutions of U and UAN in samples of St. Bernard (loamy, mixed, nonacid, frigid Typic Hapludoll) and Ste. Sophie (sandy, mixed, nonacid, frigid Typic Haplorthod) soils exposed to water potentials ranging from < −1.5 to −0.01 MPa. An air‐train system was used. Ammonia volatilization increased as soil water content increased. Volatilization differences between moist (> −0.038 MPa) and air‐dry (< −1.5 MPa) samples were reduced as the clay content of the soil increased. However, the effect of clay content on NH 3 volatilization became more pronounced as soil approached air dryness. Water evaporation was consistent with first‐order kinetics, whereas NH 3 volatilzation followed two first‐order kinetics. The initial rate constants ( k 1 ) for NH 3 volatilization (0.338–0.348 d −1 ) from U solution were consistently higher than those for water evaporation (0.099–0.104 d −1 ) at −0.01 MPa water potential and 70% relative humidity. Differences could be attributed to different energy requirements. Ammonia volatilization vs. water evaporation followed a logarithmic relationship.