Repeat six-minute walk tests in patients with chronic heart failure: are they clinically necessary?

Julie Adsett, Robert Mullins, Rita Hwang, Amy Hogden, Ellen Gibson, Kylie Houlihan, M.P. Tuppin, Dariusz Korczyk, Kylie‐Ann Mallitt, Alison Mudge

European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation · 2011 · 30 citations · 18 references

Concepts

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Owing to a reported learning effect in patients with chronic cardiopulmonary disease, performance of at least two six-minute walk tests (6MWT) are recommended as standard practice. Patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) are typically elderly and frail and it is unknown whether current guidelines are practical in a clinical setting. AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine whether repeat performance of 6MWTs in patients with CHF is related to between-test interval or baseline performance. METHODS: This was a multisite observational study enrolling participants entering into heart failure rehabilitation programmes. Participants performed two 6MWTs with randomly allocated inter-test intervals between 15 and 90 minutes. Distance walked in the second test was compared with the first test using a paired t test. RESULTS: Eighty-eight participants (45 females, age 65 ± 14 years) with stable CHF were enrolled. Mean distance walked increased from 301 metres in test 1 to 313 metres in test 2 (p < 0.001). No significant change was recorded between test 1 and test 2 for those whose baseline distance was <300 metres. The interval between tests had no significant effect on the distance walked. CONCLUSION: The change in 6MWT distance was significantly associated with better baseline performance but not with the interval between tests.

References

18