Journal of Engineering Mechanics · 1983 · 31 citations · 16 references
EngineeringCivil EngineeringEarthquake EngineeringFinite Element AnalysisStructural EngineeringShell AnalysisShell ElementsShell TheoryStructural Finite Element AnalysisStructural Response AnalysisVibration AnalysisFinite Element ModelingMaterial NonlinearityMaterial Nonlinearity In ShellsQuadrilateral ElementsQuadrilateral Shell ElementsSeismic AnalysisSeismic ResponseStress Distribution
Intending to achieve optimum finite element modeling of column supported cooling towers for seismic response studies according to the distributions of dominating bending and membrane stresses and intending to model the vulnerable shell‐column region using discrete column elements and quadrilateral shell elements, a set of elements is adopted, modified or extended. The set includes: (1) A 16 d.o.f. column element; (2) a 48 d.o.f. doubly curved quadrilateral general shell element; (3) a 42 d.o.f. doubly curved general‐membrane transition element; (4) a 21 d.o.f. and 39 d.o.f. doubly curved triangular membrane filler elements; and (5) a 28 d.o.f. doubly curved quadrilateral membrane element. Examples are given to evaluate a single type, combined types, and the whole set of elements with results in good agreement with alternative solutions. These elements may be used for accurate and efficient free vibration analysis of column supported cooling towers. The modeling may be used in seismic response analysis of cooling towers for obtaining detail stress distribution in the vulnerable shell‐column region. This model may be extended to include material nonlinearity in the shell‐column region for the seismic response studies.
16
A cylindrical shell discrete element.
F. K. Bogner, R. L. Fox, L. A. Schmit · AIAA Journal · 1967 · 132 citations
Engineering, Computational Engineering, Mechanical Engineering +17