Drain after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized multicentre controlled trial

Marcello Picchio, Francesco De Angelis, Settimio Zazza, Annalisa Di Filippo, Raffaello Mancini, Giada Pattaro, Francesco Stipa, Adewale Adisa, Giuseppe Marino, Erasmo Spaziani

Surgical Endoscopy · 2012 · 53 citations · 22 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Routine drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is still debatable. The present study was designed to assess the role of drains in laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed for nonacutely inflamed gallbladder. METHODS: After laparoscopic gallbladder removal, 53 patients were randomized to have a suction drain positioned in the subhepatic space and 53 patients to have a sham drain. The primary outcome measure was the presence of subhepatic fluid collection at abdominal ultrasonography, performed 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative abdominal and shoulder tip pain, use of analgesics, nausea, vomiting, and morbidity. RESULTS: Subhepatic fluid collection was not found in 45 patients (84.9 %) in group A and in 46 patients (86.8 %) in group B (difference 1.9 (95 % confidence interval -11.37 to 15.17; P = 0.998). No significant difference in visual analogue scale scores with respect to abdominal and shoulder pain, use of parenteral ketorolac, nausea, and vomiting were found in either group. Two (1.9 %) significant hemorrhagic events occurred postoperatively. Wound infection was observed in three patients (5.7 %) in group A and two patients (3.8 %) in group B (difference 1.9 (95 % CI -6.19 to 9.99; P = 0.997). CONCLUSIONS: The present study was unable to prove that the drain was useful in elective, uncomplicated LC.

References

22