International Journal of Nanomedicine · 2014 · 108 citations · 31 references
EngineeringBioengineeringBiomedical EngineeringBiomaterialsNanomaterialsTissue EngineeringBiomaterials For Tissue EngineeringCell-scaffold InteractionsGraphene NanomaterialsNatural BiomaterialsScaffold FabricationTissue Engineering ScaffoldsBioactive Scaffold MaterialsCollagen BiomaterialsCollagen FilmsCollagen-based Tissue Engineering ScaffoldsGrapheneGraphene OxideReduced Graphene OxideSurface Functional Groups
BACKGROUND: Graphene oxide (GO) is a single layer carbon sheet with a thickness of less than 1 nm. GO has good dispersibility due to surface modifications with numerous functional groups. Reduced graphene oxide (RGO) is produced via the reduction of GO, and has lower dispersibility. We examined the bioactivity of GO and RGO films, and collagen scaffolds coated with GO and RGO. METHODS: GO and RGO films were fabricated on a culture dish. Some GO films were chemically reduced using either ascorbic acid or sodium hydrosulfite solution, resulting in preparation of RGO films. The biological properties of each film were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy, calcium adsorption tests, and MC3T3-E1 cell seeding. Subsequently, GO- and RGO-coated collagen scaffolds were prepared and characterized by SEM and compression tests. Each scaffold was implanted into subcutaneous tissue on the backs of rats. Measurements of DNA content and cell ingrowth areas of implanted scaffolds were performed 10 days post-surgery. RESULTS: The results show that GO and RGO possess different biological properties. Calcium adsorption and alkaline phosphatase activity were strongly enhanced by RGO, suggesting that RGO is effective for osteogenic differentiation. SEM showed that RGO-modified collagen scaffolds have rough, irregular surfaces. The compressive strengths of GO- and RGO-coated scaffolds were approximately 1.7-fold and 2.7-fold greater, respectively, when compared with the non-coated scaffold. Tissue ingrowth rate was 39% in RGO-coated scaffolds, as compared to 20% in the GO-coated scaffold and 16% in the non-coated scaffold. CONCLUSION: In summary, these results suggest that GO and RGO coatings provide different biological properties to collagen scaffolds, and that RGO-coated scaffolds are more bioactive than GO-coated scaffolds.
31
The structure of suspended graphene sheets
Jannik C. Meyer, A. K. Geǐm, M. I. Katsnelson et al. · Nature · 2007 · 5K citations · Full text
Nano-graphene oxide for cellular imaging and drug delivery
Xiaoming Sun, Zhuang Liu, Kevin Welsher et al. · Nano Research · 2008 · 3.3K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Science +17
Graphene-Based Antibacterial Paper
Wenbing Hu, Cheng Peng, Weijie Luo et al. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 2K citations
Natural Sciences, Materials Engineering, Materials Science +17
Graphene Oxide Sheets at Interfaces
Jaemyung Kim, Laura J. Cote, Franklin Kim et al. · Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2010 · 1.8K citations