Anesthesiology · 1992 · 350 citations · 0 references
MedicineNeurobiologyPharmacologyBehavioral PharmacologyNeuropharmacologyPain MedicineAnalgesic PharmacologyOpioid AnalgesicsPain ModulationPain NeurobiologyPain NeurosciencePain PhysiologyAnalgesic EffectsNmda Receptor AntagonismNmda Receptor AntagonistsNmda ReceptorsPain PharmacologyPretreatmentSpinal Pain ProcessingSpinal Sensory Processing
Current thinking emphasizes that protracted small afferent input can evoke mechanisms that mediate a significant potentiation of spinal nociceptive processing and that this facilitory component has a unique pharmacology. To investigate the behavioral parallels of this spinal facilitation, we evaluated the effects of pre- and post-treatment of intrathecal morphine (mu agonist) and MK801 (N-methyl-D-aspartate [NMDA] antagonist) on the formalin test. Intraplantar formalin resulted in a biphasic appearance of flinching behavior (phase 1 = 0-5 min; phase 2 = 10-60 min). Morphine and MK801 were administered intrathecally 15 min before formalin injection in the pretreatment study and 9 min after formalin injection in the posttreatment study. Pretreatment with intrathecal morphine produced comparable dose-dependent suppressions of the phase 1 and phase 2 behaviors (ED50 = 0.5 micrograms [95% CI = 0.3-0.9] and 0.3 micrograms [95% CI = 0.1-0.7], respectively). Posttreatment with morphine also resulted in comparable suppression of the phase 2 response (ED50 = 0.2 micrograms [95% CI = 0.1-0.3]). At the highest dose of intrathecal morphine (10 micrograms), an almost complete suppression of formalin-evoked behavior was observed. Pretreatment with MK801 inhibited the second-phase response more strongly than the first-phase response (ED50 = 1.6 micrograms [95% CI = 0.5-5.7] vs. 0.1 microgram [95% CI = 0.3 - 0.4], respectively). In contrast, posttreatment with the highest dose of MK801 had no effect on the phase 2 response.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)