Rapid Prototyping Journal · 2013 · 191 citations · 14 references
EngineeringIndustrial EngineeringManufacturing EngineeringAdditive ManufacturingManufacturing ProcessesProduction EngineeringLaser Material ProcessingManufacturing Cost AnalysisManufacturing Process PlanningMetal Additive ManufacturingProcess CostingLaser Additive ManufacturingManufacturing Cost ModelingProduction Cost AnalysisSelective Laser Melting
Several cost‑model approaches exist, but most cannot compute individual part costs in mixed build jobs or are unsuitable for Selective Laser Melting. This study develops a comprehensive cost model for SLM that incorporates all pre‑ and post‑processing steps and enables precise total‑cost estimation for each part in mixed‑build production. The authors adapted Alexander et al.’s generic cost framework using collected data, modeling each SLM process in detail—including pre‑ and post‑processing—to assess how part geometry influences cost. Applying the model in a case study, simultaneous multi‑part builds reduced manufacturing and setup time, yielding an average 41 % cost reduction and allowing accurate cost allocation that prevents geometry bias and supports more economical SLM production.
Purpose The integration of additive manufacturing (AM) processes into a production environment requires a cost‐model that allows the precise estimation of the total cost per part, although the part might be produced in the same build job together with other parts of different sizes, complexities and quantities. Several cost‐models have been proposed in the past, but most of them are not able to calculate the costs for each single part in a mixed build job or are not suitable for Selective Laser Melting (SLM). The purpose of this paper is to develop a cost model, including all pre‐ and post‐processing steps linked to SLM. Design/methodology/approach Based on collected data and the generic cost model of Alexander et al. , an adapted model was developed for the SLM process including all required pre‐ and post‐processes. Each process was analysed and modelled in detail, allowing an evaluation of the influences of the different geometries on the cost of each part. Findings By simultaneously building up multiple parts, the manufacturing as well as the set‐up time and therefore the total cost per part can be significantly reduced. In the presented case study a cost reduction of 41 per cent can be achieved in average. Originality/value Using different cost allocation algorithms, the developed cost model enables a precise determination of total cost per part avoiding that any geometry is preferred in simultaneous manufacture. This helps to optimize build jobs and to manufacture SLM parts more economically by pooling parts from different projects, whereas the cost per part can still be precisely determined.
14
Fundamentals of Selective Laser Melting of alloyed steel powders
Marleen Rombouts, J.-P. Kruth, Ludo Froyen et al. · CIRP Annals · 2006 · 397 citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Materials Engineering, Materials Science +14