High diagnostic accuracy of subcutaneous <scp>T</scp>riptorelin test compared with Gn<scp>RH</scp> test for diagnosing central precocious puberty in girls

Abstract

CONTEXT: The GnRH test is the gold standard to confirm the diagnosis of central precocious puberty (CPP); however, this compound is not always readily available. Diagnostic accuracy of subcutaneous GnRH analogues tests compared to classical GnRH test has not been reported. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Triptorelin test (index test) compared to the GnRH test (reference test) in girls with suspicion of CPP. DESIGN: A prospective, case-control, randomized clinical trial was performed. CPP or precocious thelarche (PT) was diagnosed according to maximal LH response to GnRH test and clinical characteristics during follow-up. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Forty-six girls with premature breast development randomly underwent two tests: (i) intravenous GnRH 100 μg, (ii) subcutaneous Triptorelin acetate (0.1 mg/m(2), to a maximum of 0.1 mg) with blood sampling at 0, 3 and 24 h for LH, FSH and estradiol ascertainment. MEASUREMENTS: Gonadotrophins and estradiol responses to Triptorelin test were measured by ultrasensitive assays. RESULTS: Clinical features were similar between CPP (n = 33) and PT (n = 13) groups. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, maximal LH response (LH-3 h) under Triptorelin test ≥ 7 IU/l by immunofluorometric assay (IFMA) or ≥ 8 IU/l by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) confirmed the diagnosis of CPP with specificity of 1.00 (95% CI: 0.75-1.00) and sensitivity 0.76 (95% CI: 0.58-0.89). Considering either LH-3 h or maximal estradiol response at 24 h (cut-off value, 295 pm), maintaining the specificity at 1.00, the test sensitivity increased to 0.94 (95% CI: 0.80-0.99) and the diagnostic efficiency to 96%. CONCLUSION: The Triptorelin test had high accuracy for the differential diagnosis of CPP vs PT in girls providing a valid alternative to the classical GnRH test. This test also allowed a comprehensive evaluation of the pituitary-ovarian axis.