Concepedia

Publication | Open Access

Locally noetherian commutative rings

79

Citations

13

References

1971

Year

Abstract

This paper centers around the theorem that a commutative ring <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">R</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is noetherian if every <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper R Subscript upper P Baseline comma upper P"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">{R_P},P</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> prime, is noetherian and every finitely generated ideal of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">R</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> has only finitely many weak-Bourbaki associated primes. A more precise local version of this theorem is also given, and examples are presented to show that the assumption on the weak-Bourbaki primes cannot be deleted nor replaced by the assumption that Spec <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="left-parenthesis upper R right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">(R)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is noetherian. Moreover, an alternative statement of the theorem using a variation of the weak-Bourbaki associated primes is investigated. The proof of the theorem involves a knowledge of the behavior of associated primes of an ideal under quotient ring extension, and the paper concludes with some remarks on this behavior in the more general setting of flat ring extensions.

References

YearCitations

Page 1