Tropical Medicine & International Health · 2001 · 65 citations · 5 references
Veterinary MedicineInfectious DiseasesMicrobiologyDiagnostic ParasitologyMolecular DiagnosticsParasitologyAntigen Detection AssaysClinical ParasitologyMalariaMedical ParasitologyRapid Diagnostic TestsTropical MedicineClinical Diagnosis Of Parasitic DiseasesDiagnostics Of Parasitic DiseasesMalaria ParasitesMalaria Rapid Diagnostic TestsMalaria ScreeningMicroscopyParasitic DetectionPlasmodium Falciparum
We compared the performance of Paracheck-Pf, a new and cheap rapid malaria test, with ICT-Pf/PvR and microscopy in two malaria surveys in Thai villages on the Thai-Burmese border. The specificity, sensitivity, predictive positive and negative values of the Paracheck-PfR and ICT-PfR tests were calculated taking microscopy results as the gold standard. The 294 ICT-Pf/Pv tests resulted in two invalid (no control line) and 11 doubtful results. Both the ICT-Pf/PvR and Paracheck-PfR tests reliably detected P. falciparum infections. However, Paracheck-PfR failed to detect three P. falciparum cases and likewise, ICT-Pf/PvR failed to detect the same three cases and an additional four cases. These seven cases were detected by microscopy and had a parasitaemia under 150 parasites/microl. At a cost of c. US $1.00, the Paracheck-PfR test, based on the detection of the P. falciparum specific HRP-2 protein, is a reliable, easy to use and affordable tool for the diagnosis of P. falciparum malaria.
5
Emiliana Tjitra, Sri Suprianto, Mary E. Dyer et al. · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · 1999 · 180 citations · Full text
Veterinary Medicine, Diagnostic Sciences, Infectious Diseases +17
Peter Pieroni, Caroline Dawn Mills, Colin Ohrt et al. · Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 1998 · 121 citations