Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2009 · 877 citations · 29 references
Natural SciencesEarth SciencesOceanographyCryosphere StudiesPhysical OceanographyPolar OceanographyArctic OceanographyIce MonitoringSea Ice Remote SensingSea Ice SeasonalitySea Ice StudiesSea Ice Thickness DistributionIce Thickness ChangeMulti-year Ice ThicknessSea Ice DraftSea Ice Thickness EstimationSea Ice Thickness MeasurementSeasonal Arctic Sea IceSeasonal Sea Ice ThicknessThinning
The study estimates Arctic ice thickness and volume using 10 ICESat campaigns from 2003–2008. The estimate is derived from ICESat measurements across five years. Over 2003–2008, multiyear ice coverage fell 42 %, thinning ~0.6 m and losing 6,300 km³ (>40 %) of volume, while seasonal ice volume remained stable and even increased, leading to a reversal where seasonal ice dominates the Arctic ice cover and the overall volume loss is driven almost entirely by multiyear ice decline.
We present our best estimate of the thickness and volume of the Arctic Ocean ice cover from 10 Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) campaigns that span a 5‐year period between 2003 and 2008. Derived ice drafts are consistently within 0.5 m of those from a submarine cruise in mid‐November of 2005 and 4 years of ice draft profiles from moorings in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas. Along with a more than 42% decrease in multiyear (MY) ice coverage since 2005, there was a remarkable thinning of ∼0.6 m in MY ice thickness over 4 years. In contrast, the average thickness of the seasonal ice in midwinter (∼2 m), which covered more than two‐thirds of the Arctic Ocean in 2007, exhibited a negligible trend. Average winter sea ice volume over the period, weighted by a loss of ∼3000 km 3 between 2007 and 2008, was ∼14,000 km 3 . The total MY ice volume in the winter has experienced a net loss of 6300 km 3 (>40%) in the 4 years since 2005, while the first‐year ice cover gained volume owing to increased overall area coverage. The overall decline in volume and thickness are explained almost entirely by changes in the MY ice cover. Combined with a large decline in MY ice coverage over this short record, there is a reversal in the volumetric and areal contributions of the two ice types to the total volume and area of the Arctic Ocean ice cover. Seasonal ice, having surpassed that of MY ice in winter area coverage and volume, became the dominant ice type. It seems that the near‐zero replenishment of the MY ice cover after the summers of 2005 and 2007, an imbalance in the cycle of replenishment and ice export, has played a significant role in the loss of Arctic sea ice volume over the ICESat record.
29
Accelerated decline in the Arctic sea ice cover
Josefino C. Comiso, Claire L. Parkinson, Robert Gersten et al. · Geophysical Research Letters · 2008 · 1.8K citations · Full text
ICESat's laser measurements of polar ice, atmosphere, ocean, and land
H. Jay Zwally, B. E. Schutz, W. Abdalati et al. · Journal of Geodynamics · 2002 · 1K citations · Full text
Stephen G. Warren, Ignatius Rigor, Norbert Untersteiner et al. · Journal of Climate · 1999 · 648 citations
Arctic Sea Ice Extent Plummets in 2007
Mark C. Serreze, Sheldon Drobot, Shari Gearheard et al. · Eos · 2008 · 526 citations