Publication | Closed Access
User authentication through biometric sensors and decision fusion
11
Citations
20
References
2013
Year
Unknown Venue
EngineeringMachine LearningBiometric PrivacyInformation SecurityBiometricsWearable TechnologyInformation ForensicsContinuous TrackingHardware SecurityClassification MethodData ScienceData MiningPattern RecognitionSoft BiometricsMultiple Classifier SystemDecision FusionBinary DetectorIdentity-based SecurityKnowledge DiscoveryComputer EngineeringComputer ScienceGlobal Authentication DecisionData SecurityCryptographyClassifier System
The interaction between humans and most desktop and laptop computers is often performed through two input devices: the keyboard and the mouse. Continuous tracking of these devices provides an opportunity to verify the identity of a user, based on a profile of behavioral biometrics from the user's previous interaction with these devices. We propose a bank of sensors, each feeding a binary detector (trying to distinguish the authentic user from all others). In this study the detectors use features derived from the keyboard and the mouse, and their decisions are fused to develop a global authentication decision. The binary classification of the individual features is developed using Naive Bayes Classifiers which play the role of local detectors in a parallel binary decision fusion architecture. The conclusion of each classifier ('authentic user' or 'other') is sent to a Decision Fusion Center (DFC) where we use the Neyman-Pearson criterion to maximize the probability of detection under an upper bound on the probability of false alarms. We compute the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) of the resulting detection scheme, and use the ROC to assess the contribution of each individual sensor to the quality of the global decision on user authenticity. In this manner we identify the characteristics (and local detectors) that are most significant to the development of correct user authentication. While the false accept rate (FAR) and false reject rate (FRR) are fixed for the local sensors, the fusion center provides trade-off between the two global error rates, and allows the designer to fix an operating point based on hislher tolerance level of false alarms. We test our approach on a real-world dataset collected from 10 office workers, who worked for a week in an office environment as we tracked their keyboard dynamics and
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1