Non‐destructive analysis using PXRF: methodology and application to archaeological ceramics

TLDR

Portable X‑ray fluorescence (PXRF) for non‑destructive analysis of archaeological ceramics has faced skepticism. The article evaluates the parameters and constraints of PXRF analysis for archaeological ceramics. The authors use experimental matrices mimicking artefact characteristics to assess how surface morphology, organic coatings, grain size, and mineralogy affect PXRF, and then apply these findings to heterogeneous handmade ceramics from central Turkey. The study shows that, with proper methodology, PXRF yields highly accurate and precise geochemical discrimination of archaeological ceramics. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Abstract

Abstract Uncritical application of portable X‐ray fluorescence (PXRF) to non‐destructive analysis of archaeological ceramics has been received with scepticism. In this article, we present a methodological evaluation of the parameters and constraints for PXRF analysis of archaeological ceramics. We use experimental matrices that simulate characteristics of archaeological artefacts to demonstrate the impact of (1) surface morphology, (2) organic surface coatings and (3) grain size and mineralogy on non‐destructive PXRF analysis. We then apply these parameters to PXRF analysis of heterogeneous handmade ceramics from central Turkey. We conclude that with appropriate methodology, non‐destructive PXRF analysis can be demonstrated to provide a high level of accurate and precise geochemical discrimination for archaeological ceramics. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.