Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · 1995 · 549 citations · 0 references
HumanitiesPhilosophyContemporary PhilosophyIntellectual HistorySocial PhilosophyHistory Of Social ThoughtPhilosophy Of CulturePractice TheorySocial EpistemologySocial ScienceSocial Knowledge ConstructionSocial OntologySocial Representation Theory
Practices—whether in representation, political or scientific traditions, or organizational culture—are central to social theory. Turner analyzes and critiques the concept of practice, arguing that it lacks a plausible mechanism for transmission or reproduction. He contends that the concept, understood as a tacit group understanding, has no plausible mechanism for transmission, and historical uses illustrate this implausibility. Turner concludes that without a shared practice notion, social theory remains trapped in fuzzy analogies, that contemporary relativism depends on this defective idea, and that the critique will stir debate across philosophy, science studies, sociology, anthropology, literary studies, and political and legal theory.
The concept of practices whether of representation, of political or scientific traditions, or of organizational culture is central to social In this book, Stephen Turner presents the first analysis and critique of the idea of as it has developed in the various theoretical traditions of the social sciences and the humanities. Understood broadly as a tacit understanding by a group, the concept of a has a fatal difficulty, Turner argues: there is no plausible mechanism by which a practice is transmitted or reproduced. The historical uses of the concept, from Durkheim to Kripke's version of Wittgenstein, provide examples of the contortions that thinkers have been forced into by this problem, and show the ultimate implausibility of the idea. Turner's conclusion sketches a picture of what happens when we do without the notion of a shared practice, and how this bears on social theory and philosophy. It explains why social theory cannot get beyond the stage of constructing fuzzy analogies, and why the standard constructions of the contemporary philosophical problem of relativism depend upon this defective notion. This first book-length critique of theory is sure to stir discussion and controversy in a wide range of fields, from philosophy and science studies to sociology, anthropology, literary studies, and political and legal theory.