Publication | Open Access
Innovative grassland management systems for environmental and livelihood benefits
248
Citations
10
References
2013
Year
Household IncomesLivelihood BenefitsGrassland RehabilitationRangeland ProductivityRegenerative AgricultureLand UseFarming SystemVegetation ManagementNatural Resource ManagementAgricultural EconomicsSustainable AgricultureSustainable DevelopmentSustainable Land-use ManagementAgri-environmental PolicyPublic HealthAgricultureSocial SciencesGrassland Recovery
Grasslands cover 40 % of the world’s land surface and support diverse production systems, but population pressure has degraded many, reducing productivity, harming environmental services, and keeping household incomes near poverty. The study aims to optimize management practices that deliver win‑win outcomes for grasslands, the environment, and households, and to explore policy implications. A bottom‑up approach was employed, engaging all six layers of Chinese government to develop supportive policies. In northwestern China, an energy‑balance/market‑based strategy reduced animal numbers, raised household incomes, and enabled grassland recovery, with environmental payment schemes offering further rehabilitation gains and a model applicable worldwide.
Grasslands occupy 40% of the world's land surface (excluding Antarctica and Greenland) and support diverse groups, from traditional extensive nomadic to intense livestock-production systems. Population pressures mean that many of these grasslands are in a degraded state, particularly in less-productive areas of developing countries, affecting not only productivity but also vital environmental services such as hydrology, biodiversity, and carbon cycles; livestock condition is often poor and household incomes are at or below poverty levels. The challenge is to optimize management practices that result in "win-win" outcomes for grasslands, the environment, and households. A case study is discussed from northwestern China, where it has been possible to reduce animal numbers considerably by using an energy-balance/market-based approach while improving household incomes, providing conditions within which grassland recovery is possible. This bottom-up approach was supported by informing and working with the six layers of government in China to build appropriate policies. Further policy implications are considered. Additional gains in grassland rehabilitation could be fostered through targeted environmental payment schemes. Other aspects of the livestock production system that can be modified are discussed. This work built a strategy that has implications for many other grassland areas around the world where common problems apply.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1