Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets · 2015 · 18 citations · 18 references
EngineeringAerospace EngineeringPhysicsAerodynamicsComputational Fluid DynamicsFluid DynamicsAerodynamic TestingComputational AerodynamicsSubsonic AerodynamicsSupersonic AerodynamicsTransonic AerodynamicsWind-tunnel TestingDetached Eddy SimulationMach NumberNumerical Flow SimulationNumerical SimulationSubsonic TurbulenceTransonic FlowTransonic Unsteady FlowsWake Dynamics
This work examines numerical simulation of supersonic, subsonic, and transonic flows over a bluff body using several numerical techniques. Comparisons between computational fluid dynamics predictions and wind-tunnel test data are shown. The wind-tunnel test used a 7.66%-scale model of the crew module for NASA’s multipurpose crew vehicle. A variety of freestream conditions consisting of three Mach numbers and three angles of attack are considered. The wind-tunnel test data include time-averaged integrated forces and moments, static pressure port measurements, and unsteady frequency response. Results obtained using the Spalart–Allmaras Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes turbulence model are compared to solutions computed using detached-eddy simulation. Furthermore, low-dissipation numerical fluxes are applied in order to assess their effect on solution fidelity. Across the cases examined, the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes model has difficulty matching the vehicle surface pressures. For supersonic and transonic flows, detached-eddy simulation agrees well with the experiment. Subsonic flows still prove difficult for the methods explored in this work, but detached-eddy simulation and low-dissipation numerical fluxes provide the most accurate prediction of the test data.
18
GENERAL CIRCULATION EXPERIMENTS WITH THE PRIMITIVE EQUATIONS
Joseph Smagorinsky · Monthly Weather Review · 1963 · 13.8K citations
Large-Eddy Simulation of the Shock/Turbulence Interaction
F. Ducros, V. Ferrand, Franck Nicoud et al. · Journal of Computational Physics · 1999 · 779 citations