New England Journal of Medicine · 2009 · 694 citations · 17 references
MedicineOrthopaedic SurgeryPharmacotherapyHemostasisJoint Replacement SurgeryOrthopedicsAnticoagulant TherapyAnticoagulation TherapyAntiplatelet TherapyAntithrombotic TherapyThrombosisThrombosis PreventionAntithrombotic-associated BleedingBleedingPerioperative ThromboprophylaxisPharmacologic ThromboprophylaxisPostoperative ThromboprophylaxisStatistical Equivalence CriteriaSurgical ThromboprophylaxisThromboprophylaxis In Orthopedic Surgery
BACKGROUND: The optimal strategy for thromboprophylaxis after major joint replacement has not been established. Low-molecular-weight heparins such as enoxaparin predominantly target factor Xa but to some extent also inhibit thrombin. Apixaban, a specific factor Xa inhibitor, may provide effective thromboprophylaxis with a low risk of bleeding and improved ease of use. METHODS: In a double-blind, double-dummy study, we randomly assigned patients undergoing total knee replacement to receive 2.5 mg of apixaban orally twice daily or 30 mg of enoxaparin subcutaneously every 12 hours. Both medications were started 12 to 24 hours after surgery and continued for 10 to 14 days. Bilateral venography was then performed. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of asymptomatic and symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, nonfatal pulmonary embolism, and death from any cause during treatment. Patients were followed for 60 days after anticoagulation therapy was stopped. RESULTS: A total of 3195 patients underwent randomization, with 1599 assigned to the apixaban group and 1596 to the enoxaparin group; 908 subjects were not eligible for the efficacy analysis. The overall rate of primary events was much lower than anticipated. The rate of the primary efficacy outcome was 9.0% with apixaban as compared with 8.8% with enoxaparin (relative risk, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.32). The composite incidence of major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was 2.9% with apixaban and 4.3% with enoxaparin (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with enoxaparin for efficacy of thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement, apixaban did not meet the prespecified statistical criteria for noninferiority, but its use was associated with lower rates of clinically relevant bleeding and it had a similar adverse-event profile. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00371683.)
17
Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism
William Geerts, John A. Heit, Charles Marc Samama · CHEST Journal · 2008 · 3.8K citations
Rivaroxaban versus Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis after Total Knee Arthroplasty
Michael R. Lassen, Walter Ageno, Lars C. Borris et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2008 · 1.3K citations · Full text
Medicine, Pharmacotherapy, Surgery +17