Marine Georesources and Geotechnology · 2013 · 32 citations · 17 references
EngineeringCivil EngineeringMaterials EngineeringGeotechnical EngineeringMechanical Behavior Of MaterialsSoil MechanicsComposite MaterialsEarth ReinforcementGeomechanicsMechanics Of Composite MaterialsRecycled Construction MaterialsShear Strength Of SoilsAsh ContentBottom Ash UtilizationCalifornia Bearing RatioCompressive StrengthGeotechnical CharacterizationGeotechnical PropertiesShear ModulusUnconfined Compressive Strength
This study examined how incorporating crumb rubber and bottom ash into composite geomaterial (CGM) affects its geotechnical properties. The authors prepared test specimens with five rubber and three bottom‑ash percentages and subjected them to unconfined compression, elastic‑wave, and California bearing ratio tests to assess strength, stiffness, and small‑strain behavior. Bottom ash addition raised unit weight, unconfined compressive strength, secant modulus, shear modulus, and CBR, while increasing rubber content lowered bulk unit weight, strength, elastic‑wave velocity, and CBR, resulting in rubber‑like behavior with reduced shear modulus versus sand‑like behavior with higher shear modulus at lower rubber levels.
This paper investigated the effects of including crumb rubber and bottom ash on the geotechnical characteristics of composite geomaterial (CGM) in which dredged soils, crumb rubber, and bottom ash are reused for recycling. Several series of test specimens were prepared at five different percentages of rubber content and three different percentages of bottom ash content. The mixed soil specimens were subjected to unconfined compression, elastic wave, and California bearing ratio (CBR) tests to investigate their strength, stiffness, small strain properties, and CBR values. The test results indicated that rubber and bottom ash affected engineering properties of the CGM. The addition of bottom ash to the soil mixture contributed to increases in unit weight, unconfined compressive strength, secant modulus, shear modulus, and CBR at a given rubber content. However, increasing rubber content resulted in decreased bulk unit weight, unconfined compressive strength, elastic wave velocity, and CBR value of CGM. The results of elastic wave tests indicated that higher rubber content resulted in reduced elastic wave velocity and a lower shear modulus. Of the samples tested in this study, those with lower rubber content exhibited sand-like behavior and a higher shear modulus. Samples with a higher rubber content exhibited rubber-like behavior and a lower shear modulus. The CBR of CGM with bottom ash was much greater than that of CGM without bottom ash.
17
Engineering Properties of Tire/Soil Mixtures as a Lightweight Fill Material
E Masad, R. Taha, Chun-Hsing Ho et al. · Geotechnical Testing Journal · 1996 · 253 citations