Publication | Closed Access
STAPHYLOCOCCIC INFECTION SIMULATING SCARLET FEVER
70
Citations
17
References
1942
Year
Pathogenic MicrobiologyPathologyBacterial PathogensSeparate Clinical EntityMedical MicrobiologyEmerging Infectious DiseaseInfection ControlAerobic CulturingHealth SciencesClinical Infectious DiseaseScarlet FeverClinical MicrobiologyMicrobial DiseasesMicrobial DiseaseEmerging Infectious DiseasesLocal InfectionPathogenesisClinical InfectionMicrobiologyMedicine
Scarlet fever was identified by both Sennert and Sydenham as a separate clinical entity during the seventeenth century, but discussions of its etiology remained purely speculative until two centuries later. In 1869 Hallier<sup>1</sup>isolated streptococci from the blood of several patients with scarlet fever, and in the eighties W. H. Power<sup>2</sup>and Klein<sup>3</sup>traced epidemics of the disease to milk obtained from cows with streptococcic mastitis. It is of considerable historical interest that the modern concept of the pathogenesis of scarlet fever was formulated as early as 1893. Thirty years before the classic experiments of the Dicks<sup>4</sup>and Dochez,<sup>5</sup>Bergé<sup>6</sup>had written: Scarlet fever is a local infection; the infectious agent which produces it is the streptococcus, in one of its virulent forms; in the common type of scarlet fever, which one might call pharyngeal, the streptococcus multiplies in the pharyngeal and tonsillar crypts
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1