Radiation Oncology · 2012 · 18 citations · 21 references
DentistryRadiologyRadiation MeasurementRadiation ProtectionTreatment PlanningImage QualityImage Quality AssessmentImage Quality AssuranceRadiation Dose MeasurementRadiation Imaging SystemsRadiographic ImagingElectronic Portal ImagingLight Field ProjectionPatient AlignmentQuality Assurance In RadiographyRadiation Dose VerificationRadiation Field CharacterizationRadiation Field DesignRadiation Field Quality Correction
BACKGROUND: The radiation field on most megavoltage radiation therapy units are shown by a light field projected through the collimator by a light source mounted inside the collimator. The light field is traditionally used for patient alignment. Hence it is imperative that the light field is congruent with the radiation field. METHOD: A simple quality assurance tool has been designed for rapid and simple test of the light field and radiation field using electronic portal images device (EPID) or computed radiography (CR). We tested this QA tool using Varian PortalVision and Elekta iViewGT EPID systems and Kodak CR system. RESULTS: Both the single and double exposure techniques were evaluated, with double exposure technique providing a better visualization of the light-radiation field markers. The light and radiation congruency could be detected within 1 mm. This will satisfy the American Association of Physicists in Medicine task group report number 142 recommendation of 2 mm tolerance. CONCLUSION: The QA tool can be used with either an EPID or CR to provide a simple and rapid method to verify light and radiation field congruence.
21
Task Group 142 report: Quality assurance of medical acceleratorsa)
Eric Klein, Joseph Hanley, John E. Bayouth et al. · Medical Physics · 2009 · 1.6K citations · Full text
Dose‐response characteristics of an amorphous silicon EPID
Peter Winkler, A. Hefner, Dietmar Georg · Medical Physics · 2005 · 113 citations