Language, Ideology, and Political Economy

Paul Friedrich

American Anthropologist · 1989 · 315 citations · 23 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The paper situates its study within political economy, ideology, and language, outlining how each concept—ranging from economic quantification to ideological structures and linguistic symbolism—interacts and informs the others. The article aims to examine how analytic‑scientific and emotional‑ethical approaches interrelate with political economy, ideology, and language, proposing alternative logics and theories to illuminate their connections.

Abstract

After sharply defining and contrasting an “analytic‐scientific” and an “emotional‐ethical” approach and their interrelations, this article goes on to explore some possible interconnections among the three main phenomena, before discussing each in more detail. The first is political economy in several important senses; germane problems are noted that deal with (ethno) quantification and the innovative individual. The second phenomenon is ideology, in three senses: (1) notional ideology, (2) ideology for maintaining or changing a sociopolitical order, and (3) ideology for masking a structure of domination. The third phenomenon is language, again in various senses, but particularly as (1) a symbolism with a structure analogous in some ways to that of economics, and (2) a mediator between ideology and political economy; considerable attention is given to the political‐economic functions of language figures such as irony and synecdoche. A fourth, analytically crucial kind of ideology, “linguacultural ideology,” fills in the foregoing structure. Alternative logics, alternative combinations of variables, and alternative complementary theories are suggested throughout, particularly in the final section.

References

23