Endoscopic treatment of vesico‐ureteric reflux and urinary incontinence: technical problems in the paediatric patient

Abstract

Endoscopic treatment of VUR seems to be a valid alternative to open surgery, even though concerns remain about the long-term efficacy of collagen implantation. An important distinction should be made between early and late failure of the procedure. Early failure, which we define as persistence of reflux, is usually due to incorrect technique or technical difficulties. Late failure, or recurrence of reflux, which has previously been attributed to the biodegradability of collagen, seems to be due to the displacement of the injected collagen. Micturition itself or high bladder pressure (such as detrusor instability) could be responsible for the displacement of the injected collagen medially and distally, where it can no longer support the submucosal ureteric tunnel. In the treatment of urinary incontinence, both the implant technique and the choice of the site of injection seem to have a considerable effect on the results. In our experience, endoscopic collagen injection is effective in the treatment of both urinary incontinence and VUR in paediatric patients. Accurate selection of patients and technical adjustments and refinements are essential to obtain the best results.