Publication | Closed Access
State‐of‐the‐Art Report on Seismic Performance of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings
181
Citations
7
References
1994
Year
EngineeringMasonry StructuresArchitectural EngineeringEarthquake HazardsEarthquake ScenarioSeismic ProtectionStructural EngineeringSeismic AnalysisEarthquake EngineeringDesignResilient BuildingSeismic PerformanceEngineering GeologySeismic HazardsSeismologyCivil EngineeringConstruction ManagementNorth AmericaSeismic HazardConstruction Engineering
Unreinforced masonry buildings, a large portion of North America’s older inventory, are highly vulnerable to earthquakes, a seismic hazard that has only recently gained attention in eastern North America. The paper reviews accepted seismic performance knowledge of URM buildings and identifies remaining limitations, focusing on concerns specific to eastern North America. It catalogs URM failure modes, summarizes North American code requirements, and reviews a Uniform Code for Building Conservation procedure based on the ABK methodology.
A large proportion of North America's older building inventory is of unreinforced masonry (URM), constructed in the absence of mandatory earthquake design requirements, and unquestionably recognized as the type of construction most vulnerable to earthquakes. Awareness of this seismic hazard is relatively new in eastern North America. In addition, the nature of the seismic risk and other engineering constraints there shed a new and different perspective on the problem. This state‐of‐the‐art paper on the seismic performance of URM buildings summarizes knowledge that has already gained some acceptance in parts of North America, and outlines current limitations. Concerns regarding the seismic performance of existing URM buildings are formulated in an eastern North American seismicity context. The various failure modes of URM buildings or components subjected to earthquake excitation are described, and, when possible, illustrated. The state‐of‐practice as required by North American building design codes and standards is summarized. A special analytical procedure of the Uniform Code for Building Conservation, largely inspired from the Agbabian, Barnes, and Kariotis (ABK) methodology for the mitigation of seismic hazards in existing buildings, is reviewed.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1