Names and Notions of Black Studies

Maulana Karenga

Journal of Black Studies · 2009 · 19 citations · 12 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Black Studies names reflect differing views on its roots in African American activism, its scope as a pan‑African discipline, and its intellectual relevance as a distinct academic field. The article aims to critically examine the central issues shaping current notions of Black Studies and the debate over its appropriate naming.

Abstract

The principle purpose of this article is to bring under critical reflection some of the central issues surrounding and informing current and continuing notions of Black Studies and the ongoing concerns about its appropriate naming. It is a fundamental assumption of this article that the various notions and names of Black Studies are anchored in and reflective of differing concepts of the roots, range, and relevance of the discipline. The issue of roots has to do with the conception of the primary rootedness of the discipline in the African American initiative and experience and the Black Freedom Movement and its emancipatory thrust. The issue of range involves varied positions on the reach and inclusiveness of the discipline in terms of African peoples and its self-conception as a pan-African project. Finally, the issue of relevance raises questions of the intellectual value and viability of the African American initiative and experience as a self-standing discipline in the academy, as distinct from a dependent program or one area of emphasis within a regional study of African peoples—that is, Diasporan or Atlantic Studies—and its marketability as an area of competence.

References

12