Publication | Closed Access
Calibration and verification of a dissipation model for random breaking waves
407
Citations
12
References
1985
Year
EngineeringSurface WaveCoastal ModelingShallow Water HydrodynamicsOceanographyWave MotionCoastal HydrodynamicsComputational MechanicsDissipation ModelEnergy DissipationEarth ScienceWave TheoryNonlinear Ocean WavesNumerical SimulationShallow WaterWave AnalysisRandom Breaking WavesWave HydrodynamicsWave DynamicsOcean Internal WavePhysicsWave PropagationGeographyCoastal Field MeasurementRandom WavesClimate DynamicsPhysical OceanographyWave GroupBeach Dynamic
The study applies the Battjes and Janssen (1978) energy‑dissipation model for random breaking waves in shallow water to a large data set for calibration and verification. The authors used laboratory and field data from plane‑slope and barred beaches across a wide range of wave conditions, and parameterized the dependence of the breaking‑wave height coefficient on incident wave steepness to enable model prediction. Optimal breaking‑wave height‑coefficient values were found to vary systematically with incident wave steepness within a physically realistic range, yielding a 0.98 correlation and 6 % rms error between measured and predicted rms wave heights with negligible bias.
A model describing the average rate of energy dissipation in random waves breaking in shallow water, published previously by Battjes and Janssen (1978), has been applied to an extensive set of data for the purposes of calibration and verification. Both laboratory and field data were used, obtained on beaches with a more or less plane slope as well as on barred beaches, and for a wide range of wave conditions. Optimal values have been estimated for an adjustable breaking wave height‐coefficient in the model; these appear to vary slightly but systematicaly with the incident wave steepness, in a range that is physically realistic. A parameterization of this dependence allows the use of the model for prediction. Applied to the present data set, the correlation coefficient between measured and predicted rms wave heights is 0.98, with an rms normalized error of 6% and a bias that does not differ significantly from zero.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1