Journal of Phytopathology · 1996 · 17 citations · 23 references
AgriculturePlant PathologyPlant SciencesCrop EcologyPlant VirologyVirologyPlant PathogenesisPlant Virus TransmissionPlant VirusesPlant-pathogen InteractionsSoil PathogensVirus-host InteractionsPathogen Inoculum DynamicsPathogenicity MechanismsPlant Viral PathogenesisSoil Pathogen TransmissionSoilborne Pathogen InfectionViral Diseases Of CropsViral Infection ProcessesVirus Diseases
Abstract Only a few plants in a crop are generally thought to become infected by abiotic soil transmission. In glasshouse experiments we have induced almost total infection in tomatoes growing in soil with infective debris, but levels of infection are dependent upon certain conditions. We found that as the inoculum concentration decreased (i) a greater percentage of the infections were either latent (symptomless) or restricted to roots and (ii) infection levels decreased. Thus, apparent infection (based on symptoms) of 0. 10% was in reality 0 60–70% based on enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay and immunoelectron microscopy testing of roots and leaves. This occurred whether seedlings or seed were planted into infected mix. Under conditions in which minimal root damage was caused (planting seed) or roots were mechanically inoculated only once, almost all systemically infected plants were symptomless.
23
The U. C. System for Producing Healthy Container-Grown Plants
A. E. Dimond, Kenneth F. Baker · AIBS Bulletin · 1958 · 344 citations
Epidemiology and Control of Tomato Mosaic Virus
L. Broadbent · Annual Review of Phytopathology · 1976 · 172 citations
C. H. Cadman · Annual Review of Phytopathology · 1963 · 105 citations