Publication | Open Access
Formal subdivision of the Holocene Series/Epoch: a Discussion Paper by a Working Group of INTIMATE (Integration of ice‐core, marine and terrestrial records) and the Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy (International Commission on Stratigraphy)
896
Citations
143
References
2012
Year
EngineeringQuaternary StratigraphyEarth ScienceSocial SciencesHoloceneHolocene Series/epochQuaternary ResearchPleistoceneGeochronologyIntegrated StratigraphyMarine GeologyFormal RatificationGeographyGeologyCryosphereHistory Of GeologyFormal SubdivisionPaleoecologyQuaternary Period
The Holocene has resisted formal subdivision, but recent advances in Quaternary stratigraphy, including a defined Pleistocene–Holocene boundary and formal Pleistocene subdivisions, suggest it is timely to revisit the issue. The authors contend that the widely used informal tripartite Holocene division—early, middle (or mid), and late—should be formalized to standardize stratigraphic terminology. They propose an Early–Middle Holocene boundary at 8,200 BP and a Middle–Late Holocene boundary at 4,200 BP, each tied to a Global Stratotype Section and Point, and plan to submit the proposal to the IUGS for ratification. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Abstract This discussion paper, by a Working Group of INTIMATE (Integration of ice‐core, marine and terrestrial records) and the Subcommision on Quaternary Stratigraphy (SQS) of the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS), considers the prospects for a formal subdivision of the Holocene Series/Epoch. Although previous attempts to subdivide the Holocene have proved inconclusive, recent developments in Quaternary stratigraphy, notably the definition of the Pleistocene–Holocene boundary and the emergence of formal subdivisions of the Pleistocene Series/Epoch, mean that it may be timely to revisit this matter. The Quaternary literature reveals a widespread but variable informal usage of a tripartite division of the Holocene (‘early’, ‘middle’ or ‘mid’, and ‘late’), and we argue that this de facto subdivision should now be formalized to ensure consistency in stratigraphic terminology. We propose an Early–Middle Holocene Boundary at 8200 a BP and a Middle–Late Holocene Boundary at 4200 a BP, each of which is linked to a Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP). Should the proposal find a broad measure of support from the Quaternary community, a submission will be made to the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS), via the SQS and the ICS, for formal ratification of this subdivision of the Holocene Series/Epoch. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1