Recruitment variation in abalone: Its importance to fisheries management

Abstract

Recruitment failure has been implicated in the decline of several abalone fisheries. Traditionally, fisheries scientists invoke theoretical stock-recruitment relationships to predict trends in abundance of an exploited stock under various harvest regimes. The empirical evidence in support of a positive relationship between spawning stock and recruits is not strong. A further problem in interpretation of such relationships is that both 'stock' and 'recruitment' have various definitions in fisheries and ecological literature. The definition of a stock for abalone is not clear. As emphasized in this review, which considers each stage in the life history of abalone, the abundance of spawners is one of many sources of variation in recruitment. The evidence for invertebrates, particularly those with high fecundity, is that recruitment varies independently of the abundance of spawners. This is also the case for abalone, where recruits have been measured as the density of immediate post-settlement individuals, juveniles, or as adults entering the exploitable stock. A problem with stock-recruitment hypotheses is that they have intuitive appeal. It is considered 'dangerous' to manage fisheries under the assumption that a reduction in the number of spawners by fishing will not affect recruitment. Such danger to abalone stocks has been more recently assessed by egg-per-recruit analyses, whereby various harvest strategies are examined relative to reference points for egg production. These studies are reviewed and assessed relative to the often conflicting aims of managers and scientists. This review of studies of recruitment variation in abalone emphasizes the need for a more rigorous, autecological approach to stock assessment in which field experiments are conducted over realistic spatial and temporal scales, permitting robust testing of hypotheses.