Journal of Aircraft · 1986 · 43 citations · 17 references
EngineeringAerospace EngineeringMechanical EngineeringAerodynamicsFlight DynamicsFlight MechanicsAerodynamic TestingAeroelastic TestingExperimental AerodynamicsInterference TestingStructural TestingVibration AnalysisAircraft Aerodynamics TestingAircraft Stability AnalysisDynamic Aeroelastic TestingHigh-angle-of-attack Lateral DynamicsInterferenceSide Slip DynamicsSlender Body AerodynamicsSupport Effects
Support interference impacts dynamic and oscillatory high‑angle‑of‑attack aircraft tests, with static coning rigs producing a stationary wake displacement akin to side‑slip effects. Static tests at varying incidence and side‑slip angles using two alternate supports provide the data needed to correct coning experiment support interference. Thus, the same methodology can correct measurements for support interference.
Dynamic test results of aircraft models at high angles of attack are analyzed with regard to the support interference effects. Single-degree-of-freedom oscillatory tests in pitch or yaw of aircraft configurations are subject to the same type of support interference through the near-wake recirculatory region as is experienced by slender bodies of revolution. Consequently, the measurements can be corrected for support interference using the same methodology. The support interference associated with rotary rigs used in coning experiments is of a different type, being stationary in nature rather than unsteady, with the coning motion inducing a displacement of the vortex wake similar to that caused by side slip in a static test. Performing static tests at varying incidence and side-slip angles with two alternate supports can provide the information needed to correct coning experiments for support interference.
17
Progress in Aerospace sciences
Progress in Aerospace Sciences · 1975 · 522 citations
Karman Vortex Shedding and the Effect of Body Motion
L. ERICSSON · AIAA Journal · 1980 · 91 citations