Publication | Closed Access
Doing Without State and Civil Society as Universals: ‘Dispositifs’ of Care Beyond the Classic Sector Divide
44
Citations
30
References
2008
Year
Social Work RationalityCare BeyondHealth PoliticsHealth LawSocial SciencesPhilanthropyClassic Sector DividePublic HealthUniversal Health CarePublic PolicyCivil SocietyVoluntary RationalityHealth SystemsCommunity OrganizingSociologyPolitical PluralismSocial FoundationsVoluntary OrganizationsSocial PolicyPolitical ScienceSocial Justice
This article poses questions of power to social services provided by voluntary organizations. In particular, it examines the assumption that voluntary and local organizations represent ‘containers’ for a radically different social work rationality, where the marginalized are met in a more equal and attentive fashion, ‘on their own terms’. Thus, the world of volunteering and ‘friendly amateurism’ has been seen as a source of instructive ethics from which government policies should take their lead. While recognizing that this discourse on voluntary rationality has had a number of positive effects, it has almost completely blocked discussions of the forms of power exercised in voluntary services. It is suggested that questions of power, rationality and organized welfare can be fruitfully re-formulated within a Foucauldian register. Applying Foucault's concept of ‘dispositif’ to services for the homeless, the article demonstrates that social work rationality is not linked to the public/private divide but rather to a specific service domain. The article questions the widespread belief that public social services are always permeated by power, whereas those of civil society provide a more power-free domain where ‘genuine human’ meetings may take place.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1