Radiology · 1979 · 22 citations · 4 references
MedicineRadiologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyRadiation DosimetryComputed TomographyComputed Tomography PhysicsImage QualityImage Quality AssessmentMedical ImagingPhantom DosimetryComputed Tomography Dose MeasurementComputed Tomography Phantom DosimetryComputed Tomography PhantomsConventional TomographyHigh-contrast ImagingPhantom-based Dose MeasurementRadiographic Image QualityTomography
Comparison was made of tomograms of a phantom head and a normal adult cadaver head on GE CT/T, Delta 50, EMI 5005, and CGR Stratomatic units. Image quality was ranked as follows: First, GE CT/T 8800 system; second, EMI; third, GE CT/T 7800 and Delta. The GE CT/T 7800 imaged 3.7 line pairs at high contrast with an exposure to the head phantom of 2.5 R (6.5 X 10(-4) C kg-1). The EMI exposure level was 5 R (13 X 10(-4) C kg-1) in the fast mode and 12 R (31 X 10(-4) C kg-1) in the slow mode, while the Delta 50 exposure level was fixed at 2 R (5.2 X 10(-4) C kg-1). The GE CT/T 8800 could image 6.1 line pairs/cm in a high-contrast phantom with exposures as low as 100 mR (25.8 muC/kg) but a typical operating exposure would be about 1--2 R (2.58 -5.2 X 10 (-4) C kg-1). Dosimetry ranged from 1.1 to 5.5 R/scan section (2.8--14.2 x 10(-4) C kg-1) in the CT units but never increased by a factor of more than 2, irrespective of the number of sections scanned. In conventional tomography, however, exposure increased almost arithmetically with the number of contiguous sections scanned.
4
Modulation transfer function of the EMI CT head scanner
C. J. Bischof, James C. Ehrhardt · Medical Physics · 1977 · 85 citations
Visual and Auditory Perception
Robert M. Boynton, Gerald M. Murch · The American Journal of Psychology · 1975 · 76 citations