Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

Interim Analysis of a Prospective, Randomized Trial of Vacuum-Assisted Closure Versus the Healthpoint System in the Management of Pressure Ulcers

217

Citations

8

References

2002

Year

TLDR

In a randomized 6‑week trial of 28 patients with 41 full‑thickness decubitus ulcers, 22 patients with 35 ulcers completed treatment with either a vacuum‑assisted closure device (VAC) or the Healthpoint System (HP) wound gel products. At 6 weeks, complete healing was observed in 10% of VAC patients and 13% of HP patients, with mean ulcer volume reductions of 51.8% for VAC versus 42.1% for HP (p = 0.46), and VAC produced more favorable histologic changes, including higher capillary density and improvement in osteomyelitis cases, whereas HP showed no osteomyelitis improvement.

Abstract

In Brief Twenty-eight patients with 41 full-thickness decubitus ulcers were randomized to compare the Vacuum-Assisted Closure device (VAC) with the Healthpoint System (HP) of wound gel products in promoting ulcer healing. A total of 22 patients with 35 full-thickness ulcers completed the 6-week trial of treatment, during which time 2 patients (10%) in the VAC group (N =20) and 2 patients (13%) in the HP group (N = 15) healed completely. The mean percent reduction in ulcer volume was 42.1% with HP and 51.8% with VAC (p = 0.46). The mean number of PMNs and lymphocytes per high-power field decreased in the VAC group and increased in the HP group (p = 0.13, p = 0.41 respectively). The mean number of capillaries per high-power field was greater in the VAC group (p = 0.75). There were 15 cases of biopsy-proven osteomyelitis underlying the ulcers; three (37.5%) improved with VAC and none improved with HP (p = 0.25). VAC promotes an increased rate of wound healing and favorable histological changes in soft tissue and bone compared with HP. In a randomized study, 22 patients with 35 full-thickness pressure ulcers completed treatment with either a vacuum-assisted device or a combination gel system of wound care. Although there was no difference between the two systems in wound shrinkage or complete healing, the vacuum device demonstrated more favorable histologic changes.

References

YearCitations

Page 1