Applied Economics · 2008 · 27 citations · 32 references
BusinessFinanceRisk ManagementFinancial EconometricsFinancial EconomicsFinancial MarketsAsset Return ModelingEquity RiskFinancial RiskRisk ForecastingRisk MeasurementRisk-return AnalysisDownside Risk AnalysisDownside Risk ManagementDownside Risk MeasurementEquity Market RiskFuture RiskMarket BetaMarket Risk PremiumRisk-return Tradeoff Analysis
Although investors are concerned foremost with mean and variance, they are also sensitive to downside risk. In this article we employ several risk variables of traditional and downside risk measures to evaluate the equity returns in the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) market in order to test their explaining power. The test results show that variance (or SD) is better than beta in the performance. However, those traditional risk measures have almost less explanatory power than total downside risk measures, whether the downside risk measures are relative to zero, the mean return or the market index return when they are used to predict the future risk premium. The results also show that the significance of the downside risk measures in the NYSE market is different between different industry sectors, different periods of time and in different individual equities.
32
The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock Returns
Eugene F. Fama, Kenneth R. French · The Journal of Finance · 1992 · 15.1K citations · Full text
The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns
Eugene F. Fama, Kenneth R. French · The Journal of Finance · 1992 · 5.5K citations
Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis.
Keith Smith, Edwin J. Elton, M. J. Gruber · The Journal of Finance · 1982 · 3.1K citations