Relationships among Mineralizable Soil Nitrogen, Soil Properties, and Climatic Indices

Jacynthe Dessureault‐Rompré, Bernie J. Zebarth, David L. Burton, Mehdi Sharifi, Julia Cooper, Cynthia A. Grant, C. F. Drury

Soil Science Society of America Journal · 2010 · 82 citations · 67 references

Concepts

Abstract

Soil N mineralization is an important N contributor to crop uptake; however, the soil and climatic controls on soil mineralizable N are poorly understood. Soil samples from 56 sites across Canada were used to determine the potential to predict the size of mineralizable N pools through simple soil properties and through simple climatic indices and the re_clim indices. Mineralizable N was determined using a 24‐wk aerobic incubation at 25°C. Potentially mineralizable N (N 0 ) was estimated by curve fitting using N mineralized from 2 to 24 wk, and Pool I, a labile mineralizable N pool, was determined as the N mineralized in the first 2‐wk period. Soil properties were relatively effective predictors of N 0 with soil organic N (SON) and sand explaining 40 and 34% of the variability, respectively. Particulate organic matter N (POM‐N) and pH explained 18 and 25%, respectively, of the variability in Pool I. Simple climate normals were generally poor predictors of pool size except for potential evapotranspiration (PET), which predicted 24% of the variability in Pool I. The re_clim indices, normally applied to the activity of soil decomposers and applied here for the first time to explain soil mineralizable N pool size variability, performed better than simple climate indices and explained up to 26% of the variation in N 0 By including soil and climatic parameters in a multiple regression model, it was possible to explain about 63 and 40% of the variability in N 0 and Pool I, respectively, across a wide range of arable soils in Canada.

References

67