Does muscle size matter? The relationship between muscle size and strength in children with cerebral palsy

Abstract

Children with CP have smaller, weaker muscles than their TD peers. However, muscle size may only partially explain their decreased torque capacity. MV appears to be a better predictor of muscle work in children with CP than aCSA. This is an important area of research particularly in regard to treatment(s) that target muscle and strength in children with CP. Implications for Rehabilitation This research adds to the evidence that children with CP have smaller, weaker knee flexor and extensor muscles than their TD peers. However, unlike their TD peers, muscle size does not necessarily relate to muscle strength. The weak correlation between MRI-derived muscle volume and isometric peak torque suggests children with CP are underpowered relative to their muscle size. For children with CP, muscle volume appears to be the best predictor of isokinetic muscle torque output. Therefore, when assessing the capacity of a muscle, it appears preferable to measure total muscle volume and torque development through a range of motion (isokinetic strength).