Concepedia

Economic evaluation of highly purified menotropin compared with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in assisted reproduction

Adam Lloyd, Richard Kennedy, Julia Hutchinson, Will Sawyer

Fertility and Sterility · 2003 · 38 citations · 10 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

References

10

Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis

Angelique J. Goverde, Joseph McDonnell, Jan P.W. Vermeiden et al. · The Lancet · 2000 · 453 citations

, , +12

Evaluation of the relative cost-effectiveness of treatments for infertility in the UK

Z Philips, Mariana Barraza-Lloréns, John Posnett · Human Reproduction · 2000 · 145 citations

, , +17

Efficacy and safety of highly purified menotropin versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: a randomized, comparative trial

Fertility and Sterility · 2002 · 118 citations

, , +15

Comparison between stimulated in-vitro fertilization and stimulated intrauterine insemination for the treatment of unexplained and mild male factor infertility

Faheem Zayed, E. A. Lenton, Ian Cooke · Human Reproduction · 1997 · 69 citations · Full text

, , +8

Cost-effectiveness modelling of recombinant FSH versus urinary FSH in assisted reproduction techniques in the UK

Salim Daya, William J. Ledger, J. P. Auray et al. · Human Reproduction · 2001 · 66 citations · Full text

, , +17