Conservation Biology · 2005 · 627 citations · 14 references
Natural ResourcesBiodiversity ConservationConservation BiologyMarine ConservationMarine EcologyProtected Area ManagementConservation ZoningMarine Biodiversity ConservationMarine Biodiversity ProtectionMarine Protected Area ManagementMarine Protected Area PolicyProtected Area DesignArea-based Marine ConservationBiodiversity Conservation ObjectivesBiodiversity ProtectionDesign PrinciplesMarine Habitat ProtectionMarine Protected Area AssessmentMarine Protected Area Effectiveness EvaluationMarine Protected Area Networks
The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park now includes a new network of no‑take areas that markedly enhances biodiversity protection and quantitatively implements many theoretical design principles. The study aimed to clarify why existing protection was inadequate, define conservation objectives for new no‑take areas, and engage experts and the public in a scientific process to achieve these goals. The authors clarified protection gaps, defined objectives, consulted independent experts and the public, mapped bioregions, established operational principles, gathered data from round‑table discussions, evaluated principle achievement across options, and planned to mitigate negative impacts. The new network protects at least 20% of each bioregion, meets minimum habitat and feature protection levels.
Abstract: The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, an area almost the size of Japan, has a new network of no‐take areas that significantly improves the protection of biodiversity. The new marine park zoning implements, in a quantitative manner, many of the theoretical design principles discussed in the literature. For example, the new network of no‐take areas has at least 20% protection per “bioregion,” minimum levels of protection for all known habitats and special or unique features, and minimum sizes for no‐take areas of at least 10 or 20 km across at the smallest diameter. Overall, more than 33% of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park is now in no‐take areas (previously 4.5%). The steps taken leading to this outcome were to clarify to the interested public why the existing level of protection was inadequate; detail the conservation objectives of establishing new no‐take areas; work with relevant and independent experts to define, and contribute to, the best scientific process to deliver on the objectives; describe the biodiversity (e.g., map bioregions); define operational principles needed to achieve the objectives; invite community input on all of the above; gather and layer the data gathered in round‐table discussions; report the degree of achievement of principles for various options of no‐take areas; and determine how to address negative impacts. Some of the key success factors in this case have global relevance and include focusing initial communication on the problem to be addressed; applying the precautionary principle; using independent experts; facilitating input to decision making; conducting extensive and participatory consultation; having an existing marine park that encompassed much of the ecosystem; having legislative power under federal law; developing high‐level support; ensuring agency priority and ownership; and being able to address the issue of displaced fishers.
14
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Robert Costanza, Ralph C. d’Arge, R.S. de Groot et al. · Nature · 1997 · 22K citations
Natural Resources, Natural Resource Economics, Resource Economics +14
Global Trajectories of the Long-Term Decline of Coral Reef Ecosystems
John M. Pandolfi, Roger Bradbury, Enric Sala et al. · Science · 2003 · 2K citations
A General Model for Designing Networks of Marine Reserves
Enric Sala, Octavio Aburto‐Oropeza, Gustavo Paredes et al. · Science · 2002 · 399 citations
Natural Resources, Biodiversity Conservation, Conservation Biology +17