Transforming governance: Challenges of institutional adaptation and a new politics of space1

TLDR

Contemporary urban governance is marked by perceived experimentation and fragmentation, raising questions about its nature. This paper investigates how significant changes in European urban and regional governance can be understood, focusing on the re‑scaling of governance arenas, territorial focus, new political forms, and the balance of progressive versus regressive potentials. It adopts a sociological institutionalist framework that links actors, governance episodes, networks, discourses, practices, and underlying cultural assumptions to explain transformation processes. Illustrated with regional governance initiatives that challenge established discourses and practices, the study concludes by interpreting the broader significance and trajectory of transformative shifts in urban governance.

Abstract

Abstract In the context of the widespread recognition of significant changes in urban and regional governance in Europe, this paper explores the ways of understanding the dynamics of these changes and comments on the implications for recent themes in contemporary debates about urban governance—the extent of the re-scaling of governance arenas and networks, the role of a territorial focus in the new urban governance, the emergence of new forms of politics and the balance of progressive versus regressive potentials in the "new" governance. A brief introduction raises questions about the nature of the perceived experimentation and fragmentation in contemporary urban governance. The paper then outlines an emerging "sociological institutionalist" approach to governance transformation processes which links together the worlds of actors in episodes of governance with the rhythm of established governance processes—networks, discourses and practices, and the deeper cultural assumptions which give authority and legitimacy to actors and processes. The arguments are then illustrated through examples of governance initiatives from different arenas within a particular urban region, all of which to an extent challenge established discourses and practices. The paper concludes with some comments on how to interpret the broader significance and trajectory of transformative shifts in urban governance processes.