Journal of Field Archaeology · 1991 · 37 citations · 25 references
EngineeringComputer SystemsSystems EngineeringDesign AutomationTechnology AssessmentTechnology IntegrationTooling DesignTool Management SystemsTool PlanningTool Use Cognition
Generalized core technologies are unstructured chipped‑stone tools with amorphous cores and inconsistent flake attributes, typically reduced unsystematically and used without modification, and this study focuses on their application in a Mississippian context. The study investigates the technological structure and tool‑use patterns of generalized core technology, addressing analytic strategies for debitage analysis and settlement‑influenced lithic procurement and manufacture. The authors analyze lithic assemblages using debitage analysis to evaluate technological structure and examine how settlement systems and lithic distribution constrain procurement, manufacture, and use patterns in generalized core technologies.
AbstractGeneralized core technologies are commonly regarded as relatively unstructured chipped-stone technologies, lacking a standardized set of products; flakes display no consistent set of formal or technological attributes and cores are described as amorphous. Cores are reduced in a relatively unsystematic manner and flakes are then used, usually without any modification. This paper examines the technological structure and patterns of tool use for a generalized core technology. In so doing, two related issues are addressed. The first issue concerns analytic strategies and tactics in evaluating the technological structure of lithic assemblages based on debitage analysis. The second issue concerns patterns of tool use in generalized core technologies in light of recently developed arguments regarding the procurement, manufacture, and use of lithic materials and the way in which these factors are constrained by the nature of human settlement systems and the distribution of lithic materials across the landscape. Specific reference is made to the use of generalized core technology in a Mississippian cultural context.
25
William H. Baltosser, Jerrold H. Zar · Ecology · 1996 · 35.5K citations
The Analysis of Contingency Tables
Charles L. Odoroff, B. A. Everitt · Technometrics · 1978 · 1.5K citations
Journal of Archaeological Science
Warwick Bray, G. W. Dimbleby, Don Brothwell et al. · RAIN · 1974 · 689 citations
Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology
Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology · 2017 · 489 citations
Robert L. Kelly · American Antiquity · 1988 · 445 citations