Comparison of Transcranial Brain Tissue Perfusion Images Between Ultraharmonic, Second Harmonic, and Power Harmonic Imaging

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To clarify optimal brain tissue perfusion images visualized by transcranial ultrasound harmonic imaging, we compared gray-scale integrated backscatter (IBS) images of new ultraharmonic imaging (UHI) and conventional second harmonic imaging (SHI) with power harmonic imaging (PHI) (harmonic B-mode with harmonic power Doppler images) in 10 patients with and 4 without a temporal skull. METHODS: Using a SONOS 5500 (Philips), we evaluated transient response images taken after a bolus Levovist injection at a horizontal diencephalic plane via temporal windows. Based on transmitting/receiving frequencies (MHz), 4 imaging procedures using an S3 transducer (SHI2.6 [1.3/2.6], UHI [1.3/3.6], PHI2.6 [1.3/2.6], and PHI3.2 [1.6/3.2]) and 2 imaging procedures using an S4 transducer (SHI3.6 [1.8/3.6] and PHI3.6 [1.8/3.6]) were compared in terms of size and location, peak intensity (PI), contrast area demarcation, and background image quality. RESULTS: In intact skull cases, gray-scale imaging tended to show larger contrast areas than PHI. A large contrast area was most frequently observed in SHI2.6 images, despite there being more high-PI cases in UHI. No contrast area with unclear background was observed in a few cases. In craniectomized cases, all contrast images tended to have large and high PI compared with the intact skull cases. PHI, particularly PHI3.6, demonstrated sharper demarcation and a clearer background than gray-scale imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Transcranial gray-scale SHI using a low receiving frequency of 2.6 MHz is the superior method. PHI identifies contrast area localization better than gray-scale imaging and is particularly suitable for intraoperative and postoperative cases.