Publication | Closed Access
Debris From Failed Ceramic-on-Ceramic and Ceramic-on-Polyethylene Hip Prostheses
51
Citations
33
References
2001
Year
Materials ScienceEngineeringModular Hip SystemsWear TestingWear PreventionBiomechanicsMechanical EngineeringWear ModellingBioceramicSurgeryMetal ParticlesJoint ReplacementMedicineOrthopaedic SurgeryProsthesisDebris FromTitanium Alloy
To compare the properties of wear debris between ceramic-on-ceramic and ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip prostheses, particles were isolated and characterized from tissue biopsies obtained at revision arthroplasty or autopsy from two similar uncemented modular hip systems. Group A hips (11 patients; mean, 31 months in vivo) had titanium shells with alumina inserts, alumina femoral heads, and titanium alloy stems. Group B hips (seven patients; mean, 42 months) were the same as Group A but with polyethylene acetabular inserts. Particles were characterized using an electrical resistance particle analyzer, scanning electron microscope, and energy dispersive xray spectroscope. Most of the particles in Group A were ceramic, whereas most of the particles in Group B were polyethylene. Metal particles from the femoral stem and the acetabular shell also were present. If one Group A hip with impingement is excluded, the rate of particle production is significantly lower in the ceramic-on-ceramic group than in the ceramic-on-polyethylene group. With the number of samples available, no significant difference in average size could be detected among the different types of particles or among the groups.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1