Varieties of familialism: The caring function of the family in comparative perspective

TLDR

The paper examines the family’s caring role in child and elder care from comparative and gender perspectives. The study seeks to develop a gender‑sensitive concept of familialism to identify real‑world variations. The authors distinguish four ideal types of familialism, classify EU care policies accordingly, and illustrate gendered and de‑gendered variants through an analysis of paid parental leave in nine member states. Countries cluster differently across care policies, and structural gender effects are evident in the four familialism types.

Abstract

This article focuses on the caring function of the family in child care and elderly care and follows a comparative as well as a gender perspective. It aims at developing a gender-sensitive theoretical concept of familialism which allows to identify real world variations of familialism. Four ideal types of familialism are distinguished and care policies in the EU member states are classified according to them. It can be shown that countries cluster differently for different care policies. In addition, structural gender effects of the four ideal types of familialism are reflected upon. The empirical analysis of paid parental leave in nine EU member states gives an example of gendered and de-gendered variants of familialism.