Global Society · 2006 · 21 citations · 0 references
LawCorporate GovernanceCorporate LawCorporate AccountabilityCorporate Social ResponsibilityNegligenceAsbestos LitigationAsbestos RegulationContributory NegligenceProfessional NegligenceAsbestos Compensation ClaimsAsbestos CoverageAsbestos Liability CoverageAsbestos Product LiabilityCorporate Accountability LitigationDirect Corporate Negligence
In terms of industrial disasters, the chemical release at Bhopal and the long-term production and use of asbestos products are two of the largest and most controversial cases. Both events backfired on the companies responsible, namely Union Carbide and James Hardie (which, in Australia, largely controlled the asbestos products market). Yet in the case of Bhopal most victims have not been adequately compensated and, while compensation seems more assured for Australian asbestos victims, it has been a long and bitter battle for justice. How, in a globalised world, can we ensure that corporate negligence backfires and victims receive justice? This paper presents a framework for understanding how global corporations attempt to inhibit outrage and how to counter their tactics.