Outcome after surgical resection for duodenal adenocarcinoma in the UK

Leonardo Solaini, Nigel B. Jamieson, Matthew S. Metcalfe, Mohammad Abu Hilal, Zahir Soonawalla, Brian R Davidson, C. McKay, Hemant M. Kocher, Riccardo Tamburrini, Gabriele Spoletini,

British journal of surgery · 2015 · 71 citations · 24 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Factors influencing long-term outcome after surgical resection for duodenal adenocarcinoma are unclear. METHODS: A prospectively created database was reviewed for patients undergoing surgery for duodenal adenocarcinoma in six UK hepatopancreaticobiliary centres from 2000 to 2013. Factors influencing overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) were identified by regression analysis. RESULTS: Resection with curative intent was performed in 150 (84·3 per cent) of 178 patients. The postoperative morbidity rate for these patients was 40·0 per cent and the in-hospital mortality rate was 3·3 per cent. Patients who underwent resection had a better median survival than those who had a palliative surgical procedure (84 versus 8 months; P < 0·001). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates for patients who underwent resection were 83·9, 66·7 and 51·2 per cent respectively. Median DFS was 53 months, and 1- and 3-year DFS rates were 80·8 and 56·5 per cent respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that node status (hazard ratio 1·73, 95 per cent c.i. 1·07 to 2·79; P = 0·006) and lymphovascular invasion (hazard ratio 3·49, 1·83 to 6·64; P = 0·003) were associated with overall survival. CONCLUSION: Resection of duodenal adenocarcinoma in specialist centres is associated with good long-term survival. Lymphovascular invasion and nodal metastases are independent prognostic indicators.

References

24