Publication | Closed Access
Dealing with dilated ascending aorta during aortic valve replacement: advantages of conservative surgical approach
93
Citations
0
References
1991
Year
Heart FailureDilated Ascending AortaEndovascular TechniqueSurgeryVascular SurgeryValve DiseaseEndovascular ManagementPublic HealthAtherosclerosisCardiologyCardiothoracic SurgeryAortic Valve ReplacementConservative Surgical ApproachEarly MortalityCardiovascular DiseaseThoracic SurgeryVascular AccessValvular Heart DiseaseMedicineAnesthesiology
Five to fifteen percent of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) will have an ascending aortic aneurysm requiring a concomitant surgical procedure. On the other hand, a dilated ascending aorta is known to be a potential source of complications after AVR. From 1972 to 1988, 2278 AVR, either isolated or combined with a second cardiac procedure, were performed in our institution. In the same time interval, a dilated ascending aorta was treated in additional 291 consecutive patients during AVR. Three different surgical options were employed: aortic remodelling and external wall support in 164 patients (56.4%), composite graft replacement in 81 patients (27.8%) and a supracoronary graft in 46 patients (15.8%). Early mortality was 4.8%. Aortic remodelling plus external wall support had the lowest early mortality (1.8%) and the best 8-year survival (89.6%). Supracoronary grafting had a higher early mortality (6.4%) and lower 8-year survival (73.2%). The results of the composite graft were least favourable: early mortality was 9.8% and 8-year survival 76.5%. The results point out the necessity for instituting the appropriate surgical procedure for a dilated ascending aorta during AVR. They show that conservative aortic surgery with preservation of endothelial lining gives excellent early and late results.