Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2005 · 226 citations · 6 references
EngineeringChemical EngineeringEnvironmental EngineeringCarbon ManagementEnergy SystemsHeat TransferCarbon CaptureCarbon Dioxide RemovalCarbon SequestrationCogeneration SystemsEnergy ConversionEnergy EfficiencyCarbon Dioxide CaptureCarbon Dioxide Removal ModelingCarbon Dioxide StrippingEnergy ConsumptionEnergy Use ReductionEnergy Use SimulationGas-phase Carbon Dioxide CaptureOperational Energy Consumption
The state-of-the-art technology to capture CO 2 from coal-fired power plants is absorption/stripping with aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA). The energy consumption in stripping can be 15−30% of the power-plant output. A rigorous rate-based model for CO 2 −MEA−H 2 O was used to simulate several flowsheet alternatives that reduce the energy requirement using Aspen Plus with RateFrac. Results were calculated for vapor recompression, multipressure, and simple strippers at 5 and 10 °C approach temperatures and 70, 90, and 95% CO 2 removal. The “equivalent work of steam/mole of CO 2 removed” and the reboiler duty were used to compare the proposed schemes and to show the shift of energy use from work to heat. The total equivalent work for multipressure was less than that for the simple stripper by 0.03−0.12 GJ/(ton of CO 2 ), and the reboiler duty was less by 0.15−0.41 GJ/(ton of CO 2 ). The multipressure with vapor recompression is an attractive option because it utilizes the overhead water vapor latent heat to reduce reboiler duty load, recovers the work of compression to strip more CO 2, and shows more reversible behavior.
6