Publication | Closed Access
Shoulder arthrography: comparison of morbidity after use of various contrast media.
47
Citations
0
References
1985
Year
Pain MedicineSurgeryOrthopaedic SurgeryMeglumine DiatrizoateDelayed Patient DiscomfortShoulder ArthrographyArthroscopic TechniqueRadiologyHealth SciencesMedical ImagingMusculoskeletal ImagingPostoperative Pain ManagementRotator CuffMusculoskeletal UltrasoundRotator Cuff RepairShoulder SurgeryPain ResearchMeglumine/sodium DiatrizoateAnesthesiaMedicineAnesthesiologyVarious Contrast Media
This prospective study compares immediate and delayed patient discomfort in 177 patients following shoulder arthrography using intraarticular combinations of metrizamide, meglumine/sodium diatrizoate, meglumine diatrizoate, lidocaine, epinephrine, and air. Patients receiving conventional ionic monomeric positive contrast media had a 60% (90/150) incidence of moderate or severe delayed exacerbation of their baseline symptoms; only 14% (3/21) of patients receiving metrizamide, a nonionic contrast medium, had similar levels of postprocedural discomfort. Morbidity was somewhat diminished with the use of double-contrast (45%, 34/75) rather than single-contrast (75%, 56/75) examinations, and with avoidance of sodium-containing contrast agents or epinephrine. Nonionic or monovalent polymeric contrast media, despite their present high cost, may be the agents of choice if single-contrast arthrography is performed in joints (such as the shoulder, hip, and temporomandibular) associated with a high incidence of post-procedural pain.