Ecological Applications · 2002 · 511 citations · 67 references
Natural ResourcesEcologyLandscape EcologyBiogeographyHabitat FragmentationSpatial EcologyHabitat Fragmentation EffectsIsland BiogeographyLandscape FragmentationBiodiversity Responses To FragmentationFragmentationFragmented Landscape DynamicsIndirect Ecological EffectsLandscape Fragmentation DynamicsLandscape Fragmentation EffectsSchematic RepresentationSpecies Area Dynamics
The concept of habitat fragmentation has become an important theme in conservation research, and it is often used as if fragmentation were a unitary phenomenon. However, the concept is ambiguous, and empirical studies demonstrate a wide variety of direct and indirect effects, sometimes with mutually opposing implications. The effects of fragmentation vary across organisms, habitat types, and geographic regions. Such a contrast between a schematic concept and multifaceted empirical reality is counterproductive. I analyzed the stabilization of the schematic view of fragmentation by the early 1980s, using a genealogical narrative as a methodological approach. The main assumptions behind the schematic view were: (1) fragments are comparable to oceanic islands; (2) habitats surrounding fragments are hostile to a majority of the organisms; and (3) natural pre-fragmentation conditions were uniform. The stabilization loop of this view was supported by the reduction of empirical research to species–area curve fitting, which always produced expected results. I present a model of the dynamics of fragmentation research that shows the schematic, island-biogeographic view as an “intellectual attractor.” Since the 1980s, the theoretical presuppositions of the schematic view have been challenged, and empirical research has become multifaceted. Fragments of a particular habitat type are viewed as elements in a heterogeneous landscape rather than “islands” surrounded by a hostile “sea.” However, the island metaphor is still used in conservation contexts in the shape of species–area curves. It is backed by a presupposition that human-influenced environments are essentially different from so-called “natural” environments, but this is unfounded. My suggestion is that our perspective should be broadened still further so that habitat fragmentation is viewed as a particular form of human-induced environmental degradation; I discuss both theoretical and practical implications of this suggestion.
67
J. A. Wiens · Functional Ecology · 1989 · 4.7K citations
Community Diversity: Relative Roles of Local and Regional Processes
Robert E. Ricklefs · Science · 1987 · 2.4K citations
Life Sciences, Ecology, Paleontology +16
The Statistics and Biology of the Species-Area Relationship
Edward F. Connor, Earl D. McCoy · The American Naturalist · 1979 · 2.3K citations
Life Sciences, Biology, Ecology +9
Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution.
Chris Ray, Martha F. Hoopes, Ilkka Hanski et al. · Ecology · 1997 · 2K citations
Life Sciences, Biology, Ecology +17
The Commonness, And Rarity, of Species
F. W. Preston · Ecology · 1948 · 2K citations
Life Sciences, Biology, Ecology +10